Classical Hodgkin lymhpoma (BSH 2013, 2014 & 2022)
CD30+, CD15+
CD45-, CD20-, CD3-
epidemiology
Annual Incidence 2.7 / 100,000 in UK
Two peaks at 20-34 and >70
Initial Work-up
Bloods - FBC, ESR, U&E, LFT, Bone profile, HIV, hep B/C
Biopsy - 4 histological subtypes - Nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte-rich and lymphocyte-depleted - but no difference in outcomes
PET-CT - For staging. Detects bone involvement. BM biopsy not required.
Fertility preservation - consider prior to treatment
Staging
Early (Stage I/II)
Favourable (GHSG) requires:
No large mediastinal mass
ESR <50 without B symptoms or ESR <30 with B symptoms
No extranodal disease
1-2 lymph nodes involved (BSH guideline has LN chart)
Favourable (EORTC) requires:
No large mediastinal mass
ESR <50 without B symptoms or ESR <30 with B symptoms
Age 50 years or younger
1-3 lymph nodes involved (BSH guideline has LN chart)
Unfavourable – Not meeting the favourable criteria
N.B. Large mediastinal mass = mediastinal thoracic ratio >0.33 (UK NCRI / GHSG) or >0.35 (EORTC)
Advanced (Stage III/IV)
Prognostic Scores
Advanced stage patients should have Hasenclever/IPS calculated.
Hogkin IPS, one point for each of:
Serum albumin <40g/l
Hb <105g/l
Male sex
Ann Arbor Stage IV
Age 45 years or greater
WBC 15x10e9/l or above
Lymphocyte count 0.6x10e9/l or below
Hodgkin IPS 5-yr OS, by No. of risk factors
0 - 89%
1 - 90%
2 - 81%
3 - 78%
4 - 61%
5 or more - 56%
first line treatment
ABVD – Doxorubicin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine
escBEACOPP – Bleomycin, Etoposide,Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide,Vincristine, Pred, Procarbazine
escBEACOPDac - Dacarbazine instead of procarbazine —> reduced gonadal toxicity and neutropenia in paediatric randomised trials. In adult audit, reduced RBC transfusion and hospital admissions.
PET negative in Hodgkin = Deauville score 1-3
Early Stage, Favourable
ABVD x2 —> PET-CT
iPET2 negative —> options: AVDx1 + RT or AVDx2 with no RT (selected pts)
iPET2 positive —> EscBEACOPP x2 + 20Gy RT
Early Stage, Unfavourable / Intermediate
ABVD x2 —> PET-CT
iPET2 negative —> options: AVD x4 or AVD x2 + 30Gy RT
iPET2 positive —> EscBEACOPP x2 + RT
(HD14+17) EscBEACOPP x2 + ABVD x2 (“2+2”) —> PET-CT
iPET2 negative —> Stop
iPET2 positive —> 30Gy RT
Advanced Disease, Age <60
(RATHL) ABVD x2 —> PET-CT
iPET2 negative —> AVD x4
iPET2 positive —> escBEACOPP x4 +/- RT
(HD18) escBEACOPP x2 —> PET-CT
iPET2 negative —> escBEACOPP x2 or AVD x4
iPET2 positive —> escBEACOPP x4 +/- RT
Some amalgamated ABVD / escBEACOPP stats:
ABVD PFS 73%, OS 82-90% Fertility >30 y.o. 94%
escBEACOPP PFS 89%, OS 95% Fertility >30 y.o. 45%
2/3 of BEACOPP patients have grade 3-4 infections and increased hospital admissions
Supportive Care
Life-long irradiated blood products
GCSF not required for ABVD, do not delay for neutropenia
GCSF for escBEACOPP / BV-AVD
Aciclovir + Co-trimoxazole prophylaxis for escBEACOPP
HIV-related Hodgkins
ABVD + Anti-retroviral therapy
No data for BEACOPP
Teenage and Young Adults (TYA)
Paediatric or adult regimens can be considered
Late toxicities particularly important consideration
Don’t forget fertility preservation
Pregnancy
Delaying chemotherapy until after delivery is not standard practice
Consider alternative imaging – USS / MRI
ABVD can be used in all 3 trimesters based on retrospective data, prefer to avoid in 1st
Excellent outcomes reported
Age >60 yo
20% of Hodgkin Lymphoma patients
ABVD - excellent response rates but 5% TRM (HD10 and HD11)
BEACOPP - 21% TRM in HD9 trial – avoid
Use standardized frailty assessment tool
Consider limiting number of cycles / bleomycin dosing (see below)
‘Frail’ patients - avoid anthracyclines, e.g. conside ChlVPP
1st Line Treatment Summary
Bleomycin pulmonary Toxicity (BPT) (BSH 2024)
Intro
Multiple pathophys: reduces expression of alveolar scaffolding proteins + causes hyperinflammatory state
—> Organising pneumonia, usual interstitial pneumonitis, non-specific interstitial pneumonia, diffuse alveolar damage and eosinophilic pneumonia
Morbidity may be increased by smoking, pre-existing lung disease
Mortality increases with age and poor renal function
Clinical Presentation
Early signs include SOB with normal O2 sats and minimal radiological findings
Severe signs include hypoxia at rest with markedly abnormal radiological findings (often fatal)
Prevention
Avoid routine use of GCSF with ABVD
Adjust dose is CrCl <50ml/min
<60yo: Omit after 2nd cycle if in CMR on interim PET-CT
>60yo: Max. 2 cycles of bleomycin
>70yo: Omit bleomycin
Treatment
CT chest when diagnosis suspected. Lung function tests not required
Prednisolone 0.5-1mg/kg/day
Urgent respiratory referral
Relapse / Refractory treatment
1o Resistant = Progression or non-response during induction treatment or within 90 days of completion
Relapse = Occurring >90 days from completion of induction treatment (early <12 mo, late >12 mo)
Poor outcomes
Resistant worse than relapse
Limited prognostic models – PET-CT probably the most informative
Salvage followed by Autograft if fit patients (about 1/3 of patients make it to transplant)
Palliative regimens
Single agent – vinblastine, etoposide, gemcitabine
Multi-agent – PECC, ChlVPP
Novel Therapies
Brentuximab – Anti-CD30 + Anti-microtubulin agent.
Current NICE approval for relapse after 2 prior therapies or relapse after autograft (as of April 2019)
Pembrolizumab & Nivolumab – Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway antibodies
Pembrolizumab - via cancer drugs fund
Nivolumab - Current NICE approval for relapse post autograft + brentuximab (as of April 2019)
Avelumab - Anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody
Long-term Follow-Up
Minimum 2 years clinic follow-up from 1st line treatment
Irradiated blood products for life
No role for routine radiological surveillance
Lifestyle advice
Late Effects
Radiotherapy
Breast cancer - breast screening if received RT under age 36
Thyroid cancer and hypothyroidism - lifelong increased risk
Chemotherapy/Radiotherapy
Cardiac disease - lifelong increased risk of MI, valve disease, heart failure
Respiratory toxcity - breathlessness, firbosis, pneumonitis
Second cancers - e.g. 0.4% MDS/AML post escBEACOPP
Reduced fertility (see above)
Chronic fatigue
Anxiety / depression
These late effects have driven the many de-escalation trials mentioned above and highlight need to involve patients in discussions about their priorities / attitudes to risk.
Relevant trials
Early Stage, Favourable
Overall: RT improved PFS, but OS gain not yet demonstrated. iPET pos pts had higher relapse risk.
HD16 trial 2019
Early stage, favourable only
ABVD x2 —> no RT if iPET2 negative (non-inferiorty design)
H10 trial 2017
Early stage (subdivided favourable or unfavourable).
Experimental arm: ABVD x2 —> no RT if iPET2 negative (non-inferiorty design)
RAPID 2015
Early stage, favourable or unfavourable
Experimental arm: ABVD x3 —> no RT if iPET2 negative (non-inferiorty design)
Early Stage, Unfavourable / Intermediate
HD17 trial 2021
PET-adapted 2+2, confirmed omitting RT if PET negative is non-inferior.
HD14 trial 2012
ABVD x4 vs escBEACOPP x2 + ABVD x2 (‘2+2’)
All patient also got RT
HD11 trial 2010
ABVD x4 vs escBEACOPP x4 and 30Gy vs 20Gy RT
Advanced Disease
HD21 trial 2024
BrECADD vs escBEACOPP for adults <60yo
1500 patients. PET-guided 4-6 cycles. 4yr est. PFS 94% BrECADD vs 90.9% eBEACOPP
S1826 Trial 2024
Nivolumab-AVD vs Brentuximab-AVD for Adolescents and adults (any age)
1000 patients. 6 cycles. 2-yr PFS 92% for N-AVD, vs 83% for BV-AVD
<1% patients required end of treatment radiotherapy. 7% hypothyroidism with N-AVD
US SWOG S0816 2019
ABVD x2 —> iPET2 —> Switch to EscBEACOPP if postive
AHL2011 trial 2019
EscBEACOPP x2 —> iPET2 —> if neg then ABVD x4.
Not so commonly used in UK
ECHELON1 trial 2018
ABVD vs BV-AVD (Brentuximab vedotin). (5yr f/up)
HD18 trial 2017
EscBEACOPP x2 —> iPET2 —> if neg then x2 vs x4 vs x6 further cycles.
Total of 4 cycles is non-inferior and less toxic (+ shorter total treatment length).
UK RATHL 2016
ABVD x2 —> iPET2 —> Switch to EscBEACOPP if postive (16% of pts). Established non-inferiority of further AVD x4 vs ABVD x4 with less lung toxicity. IPS 3 & 4 pts higher relapse rates.
HD15 trial 2012:
EscBEACOPP x6 vs x8 (non-inferiority design)
HD9 trial 2009
Baseline vs escalated dosing of BEACOPP